The Hidden Leak Draining Your Revenue

Why preventable denials still drain revenue, and how some teams are quietly fixing it without overhauling their systems

Hi and happy Tuesday,

Every preventable denial is wasted effort you never get back.

But most teams don’t spot the leak until it’s a flood: rising rework, mounting write-offs, or a financial review that surfaces missed revenue. Not because anyone failed. Because the small, fixable errors slipped through unnoticed.

Here, I break down how leading RCM teams are shifting from reacting to denials to preventing them entirely, without replacing systems or retraining staff. The strategy is simple: stop more errors before the claim ever leaves the building.

The disconnect is real

A national survey of 210 healthcare professionals revealed what many teams already experience: rising denial rates, increased difficulty in submitting clean claims, and widespread reevaluation of revenue cycle management.

Yet only 8% are using AI to reduce denials, largely because most tools fail to address the realities of daily operations.

Want to see how AI can actually make a difference?

The most overlooked leak in healthcare ops

RCM is often sidelined in budget conversations, yet over $20 billion is lost to denials each year, much of which is preventable.

This isn’t about poor staff performance. It’s about capacity.

Billing teams handle:

  • Hundreds of changing codes

  • Shifting payer rules

  • Massive documentation volume

They’re not missing things because they’re careless. They're missing them because no one can keep up at this scale.

Why “automation” isn’t what you think

Most RCM platforms promise automation. But in practice, it often just means batching, routing, or formatting.

What matters is the actual content of the chart, the context of the visit, the payer-specific nuances, which still requires a human to double-check.

That’s where some teams are seeing results from a different approach. Not a system swap. Not another dashboard. Just quiet, smart support that helps them:

  • Review chart notes as they’re finalized

  • Catch missing documentation or code mismatches

  • Surface payer-specific rules that could trigger denials

No disruption. No extra clicks. Just fewer mistakes leaving the building.

5 fixes teams are using right now

Without buying new software. Without ripping out existing tools.

1. Inline chart review before submission

Catch errors at the source.

Some teams are using lightweight AI tools to scan chart notes and claims before submission, flagging:

  • Missing documentation

  • Mismatched codes

  • Payer-specific rules

Result: 20–40% reduction in preventable denials with no change in workflow.

2. Build an internal “Denial feedback loop”

Make every denial a data point.

Set up a simple system that tags each denial with:

  • Root cause

  • Payer

  • Provider

  • Submission timestamp

Use this to update training or flag high-risk workflows early.

Result: Improved denial recovery rates by 18–25% and reduced repeat errors by up to 30%.

3. Prioritize high-denial payers for extra scrutiny

Not all claims deserve equal attention.

Use historical data to identify your top 3 denial-heavy payers. Add an extra layer of pre-submission review just for those.

Result: 6–12% overall denial reduction and fewer appeals per claim.

4. Sync coders and clinicians weekly

Reduce documentation conflicts.

Host 15-minute weekly syncs between coding and clinical staff to:

  • Clarify documentation gaps

  • Flag repeat errors

  • Share quick wins

This tightens alignment and reduces conflicting entries on the same visit.

Result: 25–35% fewer documentation conflicts and improved coder satisfaction after 6 weeks.

5. Use a “claim readiness” checklist

Standardize quality control.

Before submission, ask:

  • Is the primary diagnosis supported by documentation?

  • Are modifiers and place-of-service codes payer-correct?

  • Has this provider had recent rework on similar cases?

Result: 15–22% increase in first-pass claim approvals and faster reimbursement cycles.

Blind spot check-in

Thank you to everyone who completed the RCM Blind Spot Check-In.
If you haven’t had a chance yet, take a moment to answer a few quick questions and receive tailored recommendations from our experts.

Next week, I’ll show you why your 835 file holds the key to stopping silent revenue leaks.

See you next Tuesday,
Dino Gane-Palmer

That's it for today!

Before you go we’d love to know what you thought of today's newsletter to help us improve the experience for you.

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.

Dino Gane-Palmer
[email protected]

About the Author

Dino Gane-Palmer is the founder of Auxee and CEO of PreScouter, an Inc. 5000–recognized innovation consultancy that helps Fortune 500 companies and global organizations capitalize on new markets and emerging technologies. He launched PreScouter while earning his MBA at Kellogg and later founded Auxee to help teams use AI to tackle complex, research-heavy workflows. His work has supported decisions at some of the world’s leading healthcare, manufacturing, and consumer brands. Dino is also the author of the best-selling book Do More With Less: The AI Playbook, a practical guide to applying AI where it matters most.